<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for BLANDLIFE</title>
	<link>http://www.blandlife.com</link>
	<description>Sports, Politics, Entertainment and Whatever Captivates the Idle Mind</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 17:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Iron Man is official the most overrated film of the year. by PhucDatBich</title>
		<link>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/577/iron-man-is-official-the-most-overrated-film-of-the-year/#comment-19936</link>
		<dc:creator>PhucDatBich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2008 14:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/577/iron-man-is-official-the-most-overrated-film-of-the-year/#comment-19936</guid>
		<description>Indeed Indy 4 suck ass, and Iron man is nothing that special to be overrated.
But
SPEED RACER? you have bad taste dude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed Indy 4 suck ass, and Iron man is nothing that special to be overrated.<br />
But<br />
SPEED RACER? you have bad taste dude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Natalie Portman Is A Str8 Up Gangsta by natalie portman</title>
		<link>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/435/natalie-portman-is-a-str8t-up-gangsta/#comment-15163</link>
		<dc:creator>natalie portman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 04:19:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/435/natalie-portman-is-a-str8t-up-gangsta/#comment-15163</guid>
		<description>that's right, natalie portman is a straight up thug.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s right, natalie portman is a straight up thug.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Whom The Bell Tolls Part 2 by trn</title>
		<link>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/663/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-part-2/#comment-14730</link>
		<dc:creator>trn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:41:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/663/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-part-2/#comment-14730</guid>
		<description>Hudson will likely never wear a D-back unifrom again. The money it takes to get Hudson back will be used to get better relief pitching or a dangerous bat. He is a great fielder and a consistent hitter but he is too expensive for this small market team. D-backs will put their weight behind Eckstein. 

As for Tai-pan, my crushing power argument for Reynolds is the worst kind of speculation because there are no numbers to back it, just scouts that say his ball goes longer than most.

It is a dangerous situation staying with Reynolds because he is and could continue to be the strikeout king. But I would bet the head office is very depressed over letting Carlos Quentin leave after a bad year and will not let another young talent go. On the upside, sticking with him now and developing his swing could save them from spending a bunch to replace him with another prospect.

The argument for stay the course, is that the D-backs were always planning on developing young talent for the last few years but somehow found themselves to be productive, so what does it cost them to stay the course, since they werent planning on winning in the first place. Not to mention they have completely turned their accounts around as a result.

I will say that if the D-backs could wiggle out of the Byrnes contract right now they would. Cojack looked good in left and Dunn at first would be a much more solid team.

To be honest, I like the young talent. Home-grown teams are somehow much funner to watch. Anyone can buy their own vegetables but home-grown corn always tastes sweeter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hudson will likely never wear a D-back unifrom again. The money it takes to get Hudson back will be used to get better relief pitching or a dangerous bat. He is a great fielder and a consistent hitter but he is too expensive for this small market team. D-backs will put their weight behind Eckstein. </p>
<p>As for Tai-pan, my crushing power argument for Reynolds is the worst kind of speculation because there are no numbers to back it, just scouts that say his ball goes longer than most.</p>
<p>It is a dangerous situation staying with Reynolds because he is and could continue to be the strikeout king. But I would bet the head office is very depressed over letting Carlos Quentin leave after a bad year and will not let another young talent go. On the upside, sticking with him now and developing his swing could save them from spending a bunch to replace him with another prospect.</p>
<p>The argument for stay the course, is that the D-backs were always planning on developing young talent for the last few years but somehow found themselves to be productive, so what does it cost them to stay the course, since they werent planning on winning in the first place. Not to mention they have completely turned their accounts around as a result.</p>
<p>I will say that if the D-backs could wiggle out of the Byrnes contract right now they would. Cojack looked good in left and Dunn at first would be a much more solid team.</p>
<p>To be honest, I like the young talent. Home-grown teams are somehow much funner to watch. Anyone can buy their own vegetables but home-grown corn always tastes sweeter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Whom The Bell Tolls Part 2 by Stephen Hawking's Football Boots</title>
		<link>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/663/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-part-2/#comment-14700</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Hawking's Football Boots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/663/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-part-2/#comment-14700</guid>
		<description>trn - what's your take on Hudson? Can they get him back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>trn - what&#8217;s your take on Hudson? Can they get him back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Whom The Bell Tolls Part 2 by Tai-Pan</title>
		<link>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/663/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-part-2/#comment-14698</link>
		<dc:creator>Tai-Pan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/663/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-part-2/#comment-14698</guid>
		<description>fine retort!  although I sense alot of "stay the course" in your response. IT is a risky proposition to think all of the dbacks young gambles are going to pay out. Please, stop with the Byrnes apologism (is that a real word). Nobody was goiing to pay him - he just got the dbacks to believe that somebody else would. He is the worst kind of showboat - he does it with a smile yet rarely produces.

Reynolds is a good hitter, but he needs to remember what got him here - high BA. He is young, and if he really does have power, it will show. Since when is 28 homers crushing power? Wouldn't you rather exchange 70 strikeouts for 30 more doubles?

I am trying not to be a hater, but the team vastly underachieved. Great points - I knew my weakness in posting on this is that I am not a die-hard dbacker. But I have been photographed in Baxter's living room!

That's all it took to bring you back? so simple my friend. I guess the answer to the defection question is NO?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>fine retort!  although I sense alot of &#8220;stay the course&#8221; in your response. IT is a risky proposition to think all of the dbacks young gambles are going to pay out. Please, stop with the Byrnes apologism (is that a real word). Nobody was goiing to pay him - he just got the dbacks to believe that somebody else would. He is the worst kind of showboat - he does it with a smile yet rarely produces.</p>
<p>Reynolds is a good hitter, but he needs to remember what got him here - high BA. He is young, and if he really does have power, it will show. Since when is 28 homers crushing power? Wouldn&#8217;t you rather exchange 70 strikeouts for 30 more doubles?</p>
<p>I am trying not to be a hater, but the team vastly underachieved. Great points - I knew my weakness in posting on this is that I am not a die-hard dbacker. But I have been photographed in Baxter&#8217;s living room!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all it took to bring you back? so simple my friend. I guess the answer to the defection question is NO?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Whom The Bell Tolls by Tai-Pan</title>
		<link>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/660/for-whom-the-bell-tolls/#comment-14692</link>
		<dc:creator>Tai-Pan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 17:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/660/for-whom-the-bell-tolls/#comment-14692</guid>
		<description>nope - no other qualities. none at all. In fact, I have a beloved uncle with three purple hearts - I think he should be president!!!  

nice job missing the entire point of the post Ralph.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nope - no other qualities. none at all. In fact, I have a beloved uncle with three purple hearts - I think he should be president!!!  </p>
<p>nice job missing the entire point of the post Ralph.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Whom The Bell Tolls by Ralph</title>
		<link>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/660/for-whom-the-bell-tolls/#comment-14672</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:50:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/660/for-whom-the-bell-tolls/#comment-14672</guid>
		<description>“If the presidency is an office that is earned through personal sacrifice for your country, then John McCain should be taking the oath of office next Jan. 20."

Sure. But *is* that how we "earn" the office? Or is it based on some other qualities, too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“If the presidency is an office that is earned through personal sacrifice for your country, then John McCain should be taking the oath of office next Jan. 20.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sure. But *is* that how we &#8220;earn&#8221; the office? Or is it based on some other qualities, too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For Whom The Bell Tolls Part 2 by trn</title>
		<link>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/663/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-part-2/#comment-14642</link>
		<dc:creator>trn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 15:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/663/for-whom-the-bell-tolls-part-2/#comment-14642</guid>
		<description>I'll take the bait...

1. Eric Byrnes. The signing of Eric Byrnes came last year just prior to the playoff hunt, it did alot to fill seats and get fans excited to watch baseball. But it also gave us a good club house veteran. After watching Gonzo going and assuming that Clark was leaving too, they needed somebody to help the rest of the ballclub (with an average age under 25) to figure out the ropes. Byrnes getting hurt was obviously not anticipated and only looks horrible in retrospect. 

2. Mark Reynolds. He wiffs ALOT, but the guy has CRUSHING power. The kind of power that when he connects everybody on the team stands up. With Carlos Quentin absolutely decimating in Chicago, the D-backs are very gun shy of giving up a player that couldpost big homerun numbers and Reynolds shows all the potential. He is a medicore feilder but the guy is still relatively young and will definitley have a lot to work on over the summer. My guess is that if his production is down for the first few months of next year, he gets put on the block. Im sure they are going to convince him to get the type of workout in that turned CoJack around.

3. Chris Young will stay. He got complacent this year with the bat but the guy has incredible range and allows medicore players to play left and right. Without Young, CoJack would have sucked at left. He is worth keeping for his defensie ability and obviously he can steal and hit. Never forgetting that he is young as well.

4. Lyon was bad. But the head office made a good calculated move. Our bullpen dominated last year with Valverde closing, but the year before Valverde was a crap shoot including a send down to the AAA. Obviously they thought that his good year was a fluke and didnt want the pressure so they got the most value out of him while leaning harder on the setup pitchers that were good as well last year. Lyons blew it. He knows it. Another hindsight call.

5. Melvin. Melvin will get at least one more year. As stated over and over, he has a VERY young team that were contenders last year when they had planned on being in development. Lots of things went wrong this year, and most of all the bullpen fell apart. Everything else could have continued as it did, if the bullpen held up. But, on paper, the bullpen should have been the better ones in the league. Lyon, Pena, Qualls all have potential but they collapsed all at the same time and D-backs gave up leads established by our starting pitchers.

Out of all your recommendations... shoring up the bullpen is the one i like, but then again, they tried all year to shore it up and everyone they brought over pitched like they dipped their hands in butter. Qualls is the closer for next year and they will look for a good young strikeout king to be a setup but there is little else they can do.

In my mind, it is a toss up for Tracy or Reynolds. Both are mediocre fielders and right now immature at the plate. Tracy needed more play time toget a good trade deal but they will likely still see what they can get for him. Dunn may stick around, he handled first pretty well and if they think its in their best interest they may trade Cojack as well while he posted good enough numbers this year for someone to take him. With a more developed Reynolds, healed Byrnes and Dunn in the lineup, Young will look much better.

I do have to call you out on the lineup issue though... the problem isnt that Melvin doesnt change the lineup enough, it is that he changes it too much. He moves it around like he is designing a living room. Players never get to fall into batting roles and it brings down the whole lineup. D-backs should be the most consistent hitter 1-8 in the league. Actually should be 1-9 but we gave up Owings for a playoff spot that never happened. I bet they wish they could get that trade back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll take the bait&#8230;</p>
<p>1. Eric Byrnes. The signing of Eric Byrnes came last year just prior to the playoff hunt, it did alot to fill seats and get fans excited to watch baseball. But it also gave us a good club house veteran. After watching Gonzo going and assuming that Clark was leaving too, they needed somebody to help the rest of the ballclub (with an average age under 25) to figure out the ropes. Byrnes getting hurt was obviously not anticipated and only looks horrible in retrospect. </p>
<p>2. Mark Reynolds. He wiffs ALOT, but the guy has CRUSHING power. The kind of power that when he connects everybody on the team stands up. With Carlos Quentin absolutely decimating in Chicago, the D-backs are very gun shy of giving up a player that couldpost big homerun numbers and Reynolds shows all the potential. He is a medicore feilder but the guy is still relatively young and will definitley have a lot to work on over the summer. My guess is that if his production is down for the first few months of next year, he gets put on the block. Im sure they are going to convince him to get the type of workout in that turned CoJack around.</p>
<p>3. Chris Young will stay. He got complacent this year with the bat but the guy has incredible range and allows medicore players to play left and right. Without Young, CoJack would have sucked at left. He is worth keeping for his defensie ability and obviously he can steal and hit. Never forgetting that he is young as well.</p>
<p>4. Lyon was bad. But the head office made a good calculated move. Our bullpen dominated last year with Valverde closing, but the year before Valverde was a crap shoot including a send down to the AAA. Obviously they thought that his good year was a fluke and didnt want the pressure so they got the most value out of him while leaning harder on the setup pitchers that were good as well last year. Lyons blew it. He knows it. Another hindsight call.</p>
<p>5. Melvin. Melvin will get at least one more year. As stated over and over, he has a VERY young team that were contenders last year when they had planned on being in development. Lots of things went wrong this year, and most of all the bullpen fell apart. Everything else could have continued as it did, if the bullpen held up. But, on paper, the bullpen should have been the better ones in the league. Lyon, Pena, Qualls all have potential but they collapsed all at the same time and D-backs gave up leads established by our starting pitchers.</p>
<p>Out of all your recommendations&#8230; shoring up the bullpen is the one i like, but then again, they tried all year to shore it up and everyone they brought over pitched like they dipped their hands in butter. Qualls is the closer for next year and they will look for a good young strikeout king to be a setup but there is little else they can do.</p>
<p>In my mind, it is a toss up for Tracy or Reynolds. Both are mediocre fielders and right now immature at the plate. Tracy needed more play time toget a good trade deal but they will likely still see what they can get for him. Dunn may stick around, he handled first pretty well and if they think its in their best interest they may trade Cojack as well while he posted good enough numbers this year for someone to take him. With a more developed Reynolds, healed Byrnes and Dunn in the lineup, Young will look much better.</p>
<p>I do have to call you out on the lineup issue though&#8230; the problem isnt that Melvin doesnt change the lineup enough, it is that he changes it too much. He moves it around like he is designing a living room. Players never get to fall into batting roles and it brings down the whole lineup. D-backs should be the most consistent hitter 1-8 in the league. Actually should be 1-9 but we gave up Owings for a playoff spot that never happened. I bet they wish they could get that trade back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Guest Book Review - Clapton Style by Russo</title>
		<link>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/484/guest-book-review-clapton-style/#comment-13202</link>
		<dc:creator>Russo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/484/guest-book-review-clapton-style/#comment-13202</guid>
		<description>66Fbwl Hello
I am Russo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>66Fbwl Hello<br />
I am Russo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Michelle Obama is a Racist and Hates America by Stephen Hawking's Football Boots</title>
		<link>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/379/michelle-obama-is-a-racist-and-hates-america/#comment-12971</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Hawking's Football Boots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.blandlife.com/archives/379/michelle-obama-is-a-racist-and-hates-america/#comment-12971</guid>
		<description>ha ha!  right on the money!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ha ha!  right on the money!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
